Summer 2006 ![]() ![]() |
|
Dietary Supplements: |
|
![]() Supplements often deliver levels of nutrients that greatly exceed the RDAs, despite the lack of convincing evidence that high levels of supplements benefit overall health or reduce cancer risk.
More than half of the U.S. adult population takes some type of dietary supplement. In fact, in 2005, this growing constituency spent about $23 billion on such products. Choosing a supplement today is no small task. Most supplements contain one or more essential vitamins and minerals. Some contain compounds found in foods that are not considered nutrients, such as isoflavonoids (from soy products), while others contain herbal and botanical compounds not normally found in foods (such as saw palmetto or ginseng). Increasingly, dietary supplements contain combinations of many different compounds. Furthermore, the line between a food and a dietary supplement has become blurred, because compounds found primarily only in dietary supplements are now being added to foods (e.g., ginseng in beverages), while foods can appear on the market as pills or capsules (e.g., dried cranberry powder). Some dietary supplements provide nutrients at approximately the recommended daily level (following guidelines such as the Recommended Dietary Allowance (RDA) or Daily Values), while other supplements provide much higher levels, often beyond those obtainable from food alone. In many countries, bottle labels provide information on the percent of the recommended nutrient intake that is supplied by a dose of the supplement (see image). Do Supplements Protect Against Cancer? Many dietary supplements deliver levels of nutrients that greatly exceed the RDAs, often at levels not possible to achieve with food alone. Many studies in different parts of the world have addressed the question of whether high levels of supplements can reduce cancer risk in relatively well-nourished populations. Observational studies that have looked at cancer risk among people who chose to use dietary supplements have sometimes found significant associations, but many of these associations have not been supported by placebo-controlled randomized trials. The observational studies may be misleading because, as is well-known, people who choose to use supplements generally have healthier behaviors (such as better diets and lower body weights) than those who do not use supplements, and these confounding factors may contribute to their lower risk of cancer. Results from randomized trials to date do not provide conclusive evidence about the efficacy of dietary supplements. From 1985-1993, one of the few trials showing a positive effect of supplements found a decreased risk of prostate cancer (and, possibly, of colon cancer) among male smokers who were given 50 mg of vitamin E per day (about three times the RDA). However, several other high-dose vitamin E trials did not demonstrate a reduction in cancer risk, or in total mortality. Three studies have demonstrated a protective effect of selenium supplements for certain cancers, but the studies have several flaws and the results are inconclusive. In a 1994-2002 study in France, a combination of several antioxidants (vitamin C, vitamin E, beta-carotene, selenium and zinc) at about twice the RDAs reduced the overall risk of cancer in men, but not in women. An ongoing trial in the United States, Puerto Rico and Canada of the effect of selenium and vitamin E supplementation on prostate cancer may allow stronger conclusions about supplements of these two nutrients, at least for this particular cancer site. Do Supplements Increase Cancer Risk? The Bottom Line In May 2006, a panel convened by the National Institutes of Health in the United States concluded, “The present evidence is insufficient to recommend either for or against the use of multivitamin/mineral supplements by the American public to prevent chronic disease.” |
|
Center for Communications,
Health and the Environment 4437 Reservoir Road, NW, Washington, DC 20007 Tel: (202) 965-5990 . Fax: (202) 965-5996 Email: ceche@comcast.net |
|